No, Hugh Dancy Will Not Be in a Next ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’ Movie

January 29, 2017 - Fifty Shades of Grey


FAKE NEWS Observer

Last April, it was widely reported that Hugh Dancy would be appearing in Fifty Shades Darker, a second film in a “Fifty Shades” array as Dr. John Flynn, Christian Grey’s clergyman and associate porn-actor-sounding-name haver. The casting was reliable by Variety among others, and Just Jared even published photos of Dancy nearing in Vancouver for shooting.

However, in a new talk with a Observer, Dancy done transparent that he would not be appearing in a film (the purpose has been sensitively private from his IMDB, and from a Fifty Shades Darker Wikipedia page, where his name had seemed as recently as final week.)

Here is a accurate twin of how a review took place:

OBSERVER: So you’re not going to be in a subsequent “Fifty Shadesmovie
OBSERVER: Even nonetheless a Wikipedia page and a whole Internet says we are?
HUGH DANCY: we know, we theory I’m a vital counterbalance of a internet.
OBSERVER: I guess… I’ll have to go on your word.
HUGH DANCY: [Laughs] No, I’m not lying.

After we published a article, some sagacious Fifty Shades fans forked out that Dancy appears quickly in a throng stage in one of the trailers for a film.

Whether that stage will be enclosed in a movie’s final revise is nonetheless to be seen, as is either Dr. Flynn will be private from a story completely, or recast. But what’s certain is unless that pleasing male done a liar out of us both, we won’t be saying Hugh Dancy psychoanalyzing Christian Grey come Feb 14.

Sorry to all of a “Fifty Shades” fans, and congrats to all of a Hugh Dancy fans who hatred “Fifty Shades.”

source ⦿

More shades ...

› tags: Fifty Shades of Grey /