Why Is ‘Fifty Shades Freed’ Glamorizing Sexual Violence in a #MeToo Culture?

November 13, 2017 - Fifty Shades of Grey

The “Fifty Shades Freed” trailer only came out. Shudder.

As a lady vital in a age of #MeToo, we am doubtful by how many of my associate women like a Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy. Some people advise a books are appealing to women since they play into women’s ‘relationship fantasies.’

 

The thought that attack perpetrated opposite (college tyro and eventually Mrs. Grey) Ana Steele by (wealthy businessman) Christian Grey is possibly healthy or amatory is only that – a fantasy.

 

For a some-more picturesque demeanour during how a passionate confront between a intimately abusive, egomaniacal multi-millionaire and a young, exposed lady would finish for a immature woman, demeanour no serve than George Soros’ sidestep account manager, Howie Rubin.

 

Rubin allegedly kick and raped 3 opposite women in his creepy penthouse BDSM dungeon, according to a lawsuit one lady filed opposite him. 

 

The sum of that box are horrific, so because is Fifty Shades glamorizing this form of abuse as small party in a age of #MeToo and Harvey Weinstein?

 

Women wish and merit healthy and consensual insinuate relationships. So, Fifty Shades author E.L. James dressed adult a sadomasochistic, violent passionate attribute as only that – one that finished in loyal love, was formed on consent, and was healthy for both partners.

 

This groundless distortion becomes all a some-more nauseating in a third partial of a trilogy, when Christian Grey tells his wife, Ana, who suspects him of cheating, that he “made a vouch to adore [her] faithfully, forsaking all others, to comfort [her] in times of need, and to keep [her] safe.”

 

Apparently Christian Grey’s clarification of “safe” doesn’t embody physical, emotional, or psychological reserve for Ana, only ultra-possessive jealousy on his partial that keeps her “safe” from other men.

 

Some competence disagree that Ana’s character, and maybe women in a identical attribute in genuine life, agree to a abuse they suffer, and that it spices adult their regretful life. But agree does not mislay a psychological and earthy repairs combined by their indignity and abuse.

 

As we see from Howie Rubin’s example, even among “consenting” participants, many are mostly coerced to continue opposite their will and comfort level due to a vigour to seem “into it,” to equivocate alienating their insinuate partner.

 

It is impossibly socially insane to defend Fifty Shades as mainstream entertainment, while during a same time we demonstrate a snub during Harvey Weinstein and his ilk, and while we work to exterminate passionate harassment, passionate assault, and a rape parable genius from a culture.

 

As prolonged as we continue to support, normalize, and devour calm like Fifty Shades, where passionate attack is king, we work opposite ourselves, and we criticise a eminent idea of finale passionate abuse and domestic violence, generally opposite women, in a society.

 

We unequivocally can’t have a cake and eat it too, friends. It’s time to arise adult to that reality.

 

Until we do, we sham ourselves into meditative we can make #MeToo hashtags story while we accelerate Fifty Shades sheet sales during a box office. If we as a republic wish to send a clever summary that passionate abuse is never okay, let’s send it in a confidant approach this Feb when “Fifty Shades Freed” comes out, and make it a sum flop.

 

Katherine Blakeman is a Director of Communications during a National Center on Sexual Exploitation.

source ⦿ https://townhall.com/columnists/katherineblakeman/2017/11/13/why-is-fifty-shades-freed-glamorizing-sexual-violence-in-a-metoo-culture-n2408835

More shades ...

› tags: Fifty Shades of Grey /